Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Quirine Lemoine Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W L L L
Form
L L L L L L W W W LH2H: Fruchtman 1 - 0 Lemoine
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fruchtman winning 2 and Lemoine winning 1. The last match between Fruchtman and Lemoine was at the W25 Kiryat Motzkin, 26-10-2021, First, Hard with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory 1-6 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mika Dagan Fruchtman | 1 |
| Quirine Lemoine | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Quirine Lemoine
73%
(
82 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
88 of
135)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
10
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
51%
(
57 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
68 of
135)
123
Total Points Won
124
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:42:0 | Average Match Time | 2:42:0 |
| 73% (82/112) | 1st Serve % | 65% (88/135) |
| 50% (41/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (50/88) |
| 47% (14/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (17/47) |
| 32% (7/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 50% (68/135) | Return Points Win % | 51% (57/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Quirine Lemoine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Quirine Lemoine
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Erica Oosterhout
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Kurumi Nara
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quirine Lemoine
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maileen Nuudi
Player
Quirine Lemoine
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Quirine Lemoine
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Quirine Lemoine
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Quirine Lemoine
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quirine Lemoine
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (53/53) | Win/Loss | 63% (306/180) |
| 49% (118/121) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (658/428) |
| 50% (1104/1115) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5283/4457) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 52 | Aces Total | 184 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 456 | Total Double Faults | 863 |
| 1:19:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 370.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 558.87 |
| 65% (3411/5254) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9006/14713) |
| 58% (1970/3411) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5401/9006) |
| 40% (728/1841) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2477/5707) |
| 46% (316/684) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1024/2013) |
| 47% (2538/5442) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7237/14992) |
| 50% (52/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (301/475) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (6/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (52/81) |
| 50% (14/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (75/126) |
| 88% (51/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (288/262) |
| 12% (51/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (288/25) |
| 13% (55/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (197/44) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
